CLEMSON — Clemson Mayor Larry Abernathy, who has served on city council for 32 years, said Monday night that he remembers when council discontinued public prayer issued prior to meetings more than 15 years ago.
“Council felt very strongly that if every faith could not be represented, then we needed to look at an alternative,” Abernathy said, adding, “It became extremely difficult to ensure that all faiths were represented, and it became so difficult that the problem started to outweigh the payoff.”
During the July 7 meeting, council member Nancy Bennett said the state legislature recently approved prayer before council meetings and asked her fellow members to consider its implementation at future meetings. The Senate bill, which was sponsored, in part, by Larry Martin, of Pickens County, and Thomas Alexander, who represents Oconee and a portion of Pickens counties, allows state or local governing bodies to adopt a policy allowing for an open invocation through one of three methods:
• One of the public officials, as long as the opportunity is regularly and objectively rotated among all of that body’s public officials;
• A chaplain elected by the public officials of the deliberative public body;
• An invocation speaker selected on an objective and rotating basis from a wide pool of religious leaders serving established religious congregations in the local community in which the deliberative public body meets.
Abernathy, addressing council during its regularly scheduled meeting, said the issue “is more complicated than we tend to think.”
“It’s more than saying ‘We’re going to do this, and this is how we’re going to do it,’” he said. “We need to think about complete representations of faith.”
The mayor said there is also a matter of federal law, adding, “I believe this is a Supreme Court issue, and I’m not sure the South Carolina Supreme Court in all its wisdom can pass a state law that supercedes a federal law.”
Mayor Pro Tem Butch Trent suggested that council resume discussion on the issue at the next meeting, citing the absence of Bennett and her desire to provide input.
“Nancy feels very strongly about this,” Trent said. “I want Nancy to have an opportunity to talk.”
Abernathy suggested that council could offer prayer in a meeting room, apart from council chambers, while council member J.C. Cook proposed a moment of silence.
“That would not offend anyone,” Cook said, adding, “People could do what they want.”
Council member Margaret Thompson said the sad part is that only “the minority (of residents) in the United States are opposed (to an invocation at public meetings).”
“That’s a doggone shame,” Thompson said.
Abernathy requested that the issue be placed back on the agenda for the Aug. 4 meeting and allow for public, as well as additional council, input. The mayor also asked retired Clemson University professor Roger Rollin, who spoke in opposition of the public prayer issue — citing various court cases — during the public comment session, to forward him that information for further review.
July 22, 2008
1:16 p.m.Report inappropriate content
What's interesting is the true ignorance of most people concerning our Constitution. This goes for most regular folks but especially for our politicians and judges. The Constitution was created by a Confederation of States and the Amendments limit the powers of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT alone hence the reaon it states, "congress shall make no law..." That is to say, that the Federal Government cannot establish one religion over the other. The States, however, are left to their own accord. This is the reason for the 10th Amendment. "Those powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people". South Carolina, as a soverign state has chosen to make prayer an acceptable practice in council meetings, etc. To insist,like Mayor Abernathy has done, that Federal Law may supercede State law is the crux of the problem we have with our spineless politicians that have created the massive, powerful federal government we have today.
Our constitution is for limiting the powers of the federal government and ensuring the rights of the States and/or people. Our forefathers knew far too well what would happen if a government became too powerful. I would suggest that most all of them are spinning in in their graves now with where we have come.
Stand up and be counted.